We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 76 | clear |
76 \(\Rightarrow\) 425 |
On first and second countable spaces and the axiom of choice, Gutierres, G 2004, Topology and its Applications. |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
67: | \(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite). |
76: | \(MC_\omega(\infty,\infty)\) (\(\omega\)-MC): For every family \(X\) of pairwise disjoint non-empty sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for each \(x\in X\), f(x) is a non-empty countable subset of \(x\). |
425: | For every first countable topological space \((X, \Cal T)\) there is a family \((\Cal D(x))_{x \in X}\) such that \(\forall x \in X\), \(D(x)\) countable local base at \(x\). \ac{Gutierres} \cite{2004} and note 159. |
Comment: