Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

28-p \(\Rightarrow\) 108
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
28-p \(\Rightarrow\) 427 clear
427 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 clear
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 89 On cardinals and their successors, Jech, T. 1966a, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys.
89 \(\Rightarrow\) 90 The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 133
90 \(\Rightarrow\) 51 Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
51 \(\Rightarrow\) 25 Choice and cofinal well-ordered subsets, Morris, D.B. 1969, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.
25 \(\Rightarrow\) 34 clear
34 \(\Rightarrow\) 38 The Axiom of Choice, Jech, [1973b]
38 \(\Rightarrow\) 108 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
28-p:

(Where \(p\) is a prime) AL20(\(\mathbb Z_p\)): Every vector space \(V\) over \(\mathbb Z_p\) has the property that every linearly independent subset can be extended to a basis.  (\(\mathbb Z_p\) is the \(p\) element field.) Rubin, H./Rubin, J. [1985], p. 119, Statement AL20

427: \(\exists F\) AL20(\(F\)): There is a field \(F\) such that every vector space \(V\) over \(F\) has the property that every independent subset of \(V\) can be extended to a basis.  \ac{Bleicher} \cite{1964}, \ac{Rubin, H.\/Rubin, J \cite{1985, p.119, AL20}.
67:

\(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite).

89:

Antichain Principle:  Every partially ordered set has a maximal antichain. Jech [1973b], p 133.

90:

\(LW\):  Every linearly ordered set can be well ordered. Jech [1973b], p 133.

51:

Cofinality Principle: Every linear ordering has a cofinal sub well ordering.  Sierpi\'nski [1918], p 117.

25:

\(\aleph _{\beta +1}\) is regular for all ordinals \(\beta\).

34:

\(\aleph_{1}\) is regular.

38:

\({\Bbb R}\) is not the union of a countable family of countable sets.

108:

There is an ordinal \(\alpha\) such that \(2^{\aleph _{\alpha}}\) is not the union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets.

Comment:

Back