We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 334 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 | clear |
| 67 \(\Rightarrow\) 144 |
Axioms of multiple choice, Levy, A. 1962, Fund. Math. |
| 144 \(\Rightarrow\) 414 |
Constructive order theory, Ern'e, M. 2001, Math. Logic Quart. |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 334: | \(MC(\infty,\infty,\hbox{ even})\): For every set \(X\) of sets such that for all \(x\in X\), \(|x|\ge 2\), there is a function \(f\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\) and \(|f(x)|\) is even. |
| 67: | \(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite). |
| 144: | Every set is almost well orderable. |
| 414: | Every \(\cal W\)-frame is a \(\cal D\)-frame. \ac{Ern\'e} \cite{2000} |
Comment: