We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 381 |
Disjoint unions of topological spaces and choice, Howard, P. 1998b, Math. Logic Quart. |
381 \(\Rightarrow\) 382 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
67: | \(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite). |
381: | DUM: The disjoint union of metrizable spaces is metrizable. |
382: | DUMN: The disjoint union of metrizable spaces is normal. |
Comment: