Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

214 \(\Rightarrow\) 425 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
214 \(\Rightarrow\) 76	clear
76 \(\Rightarrow\) 425	On first and second countable spaces and the axiom of choice, Gutierres, G 2004, Topology and its Applications.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
214:	\(Z(\omega)\): For every family \(A\) of infinite sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in A\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty subset of \(y\) and \(\|f(y)\|=\aleph_{0}\).
76:	\(MC_\omega(\infty,\infty)\) (\(\omega\)-MC): For every family \(X\) of pairwise disjoint non-empty sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for each \(x\in X\), f(x) is a non-empty countable subset of \(x\).
425:	For every first countable topological space \((X, \Cal T)\) there is a family \((\Cal D(x))_{x \in X}\) such that \(\forall x \in X\), \(D(x)\) countable local base at \(x\). \ac{Gutierres} \cite{2004} and note 159.

Comment:

Back