We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
130 \(\Rightarrow\) 79 | clear |
79 \(\Rightarrow\) 38 | clear |
38 \(\Rightarrow\) 108 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
130: | \({\cal P}(\Bbb R)\) is well orderable. |
79: | \({\Bbb R}\) can be well ordered. Hilbert [1900], p 263. |
38: | \({\Bbb R}\) is not the union of a countable family of countable sets. |
108: | There is an ordinal \(\alpha\) such that \(2^{\aleph _{\alpha}}\) is not the union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets. |
Comment: