We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
91 \(\Rightarrow\) 79 | clear |
79 \(\Rightarrow\) 94 | clear |
94 \(\Rightarrow\) 13 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 148 problem 10.1 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
91: | \(PW\): The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered. |
79: | \({\Bbb R}\) can be well ordered. Hilbert [1900], p 263. |
94: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty,{\Bbb R})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty sets of reals has a choice function. Jech [1973b], p 148 prob 10.1. |
13: | Every Dedekind finite subset of \({\Bbb R}\) is finite. |
Comment: