We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 358 \(\Rightarrow\) 80 | clear |
| 80 \(\Rightarrow\) 389 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 358: | \(KW(\aleph_0,<\aleph_0)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a denumerable family of finite sets: For every denumerable set \(M\) of finite sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). |
| 80: | \(C(\aleph_{0},2)\): Every denumerable set of pairs has a choice function. |
| 389: | \(C(\aleph_0,2,\cal P({\Bbb R}))\): Every denumerable family of two element subsets of \(\cal P({\Bbb R})\) has a choice function. \ac{Keremedis} \cite{1999b}. |
Comment: