We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
28-p \(\Rightarrow\) 427 | clear |
427 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 | clear |
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 126 | clear |
126 \(\Rightarrow\) 82 | note-76 |
82 \(\Rightarrow\) 83 |
Definitions of finite, Howard, P. 1989, Fund. Math. |
83 \(\Rightarrow\) 64 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 52 problem 4.10 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
28-p: | (Where \(p\) is a prime) AL20(\(\mathbb Z_p\)): Every vector space \(V\) over \(\mathbb Z_p\) has the property that every linearly independent subset can be extended to a basis. (\(\mathbb Z_p\) is the \(p\) element field.) Rubin, H./Rubin, J. [1985], p. 119, Statement AL20 |
427: | \(\exists F\) AL20(\(F\)): There is a field \(F\) such that every vector space \(V\) over \(F\) has the property that every independent subset of \(V\) can be extended to a basis. \ac{Bleicher} \cite{1964}, \ac{Rubin, H.\/Rubin, J \cite{1985, p.119, AL20}. |
67: | \(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite). |
126: | \(MC(\aleph_0,\infty)\), Countable axiom of multiple choice: For every denumerable set \(X\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in X\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty finite subset of \(y\). |
82: | \(E(I,III)\) (Howard/Yorke [1989]): If \(X\) is infinite then \(\cal P(X)\) is Dedekind infinite. (\(X\) is finite \(\Leftrightarrow {\cal P}(X)\) is Dedekind finite.) |
83: | \(E(I,II)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]: \(T\)-finite is equivalent to finite. |
64: | \(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.) |
Comment: