Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

215 \(\Rightarrow\) 127 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
215 \(\Rightarrow\) 83	clear
83 \(\Rightarrow\) 64	The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 52 problem 4.10
64 \(\Rightarrow\) 127	Amorphe Potenzen kompakter Raume, Brunner, N. 1984b, Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforschung

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
215:	If \((\forall y\subseteq X)(y\) can be linearly ordered implies \(y\) is finite), then \(X\) is finite.
83:	\(E(I,II)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]: \(T\)-finite is equivalent to finite.
64:	\(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.)
127:	An amorphous power of a compact \(T_2\) space, which as a set is well orderable, is well orderable.

Comment:

Back