Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

213 \(\Rightarrow\) 11
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
213 \(\Rightarrow\) 85 clear
85 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 clear
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 61 clear
61 \(\Rightarrow\) 11 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
213:

\(C(\infty,\aleph_{1})\): If \((\forall y\in X)(|y| = \aleph_{1})\) then \(X\) has a choice function.

85:

\(C(\infty,\aleph_{0})\):  Every family of denumerable sets has  a choice function.  Jech [1973b] p 115 prob 7.13.

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

61:

\((\forall n\in\omega, n\ge 2\))\((C(\infty,n))\): For each \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\), every set of \(n\) element  sets has a choice function.

11:

A Form of Restricted Choice for Families of Finite Sets: For every infinite set \(A\), \(A\) has an infinite subset \(B\) such that for every \(n\in\omega\), \(n>0\), the set of all \(n\) element subsets of \(B\) has a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco [1998b]

Comment:

Back