We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
213 \(\Rightarrow\) 85 | clear |
85 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 | clear |
32 \(\Rightarrow\) 350 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
213: | \(C(\infty,\aleph_{1})\): If \((\forall y\in X)(|y| = \aleph_{1})\) then \(X\) has a choice function. |
85: | \(C(\infty,\aleph_{0})\): Every family of denumerable sets has a choice function. Jech [1973b] p 115 prob 7.13. |
32: | \(C(\aleph_0,\le\aleph_0)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty countable sets has a choice function. |
350: | \(MC(\aleph_0,\aleph_0)\): For every denumerable set \(X\) of non-empty denumerable sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\). |
Comment: