Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

213 \(\Rightarrow\) 378
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
213 \(\Rightarrow\) 85 clear
85 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 clear
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 378 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
213:

\(C(\infty,\aleph_{1})\): If \((\forall y\in X)(|y| = \aleph_{1})\) then \(X\) has a choice function.

85:

\(C(\infty,\aleph_{0})\):  Every family of denumerable sets has  a choice function.  Jech [1973b] p 115 prob 7.13.

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

378:

Restricted Choice for Families of Well Ordered Sets:  For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) such that the family of non-empty well orderable subsets of \(Y\) has a choice function.

Comment:

Back