We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
292 \(\Rightarrow\) 90 |
The axiom of choice and linearly ordered sets, Howard, P. 1977, Fund. Math. |
90 \(\Rightarrow\) 51 |
Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
51 \(\Rightarrow\) 25 |
Choice and cofinal well-ordered subsets, Morris, D.B. 1969, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. |
25 \(\Rightarrow\) 315 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
292: | \(MC(LO,\infty)\): For each linearly ordered family of non-empty sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is non-empty, finite subset of \(x\). |
90: | \(LW\): Every linearly ordered set can be well ordered. Jech [1973b], p 133. |
51: | Cofinality Principle: Every linear ordering has a cofinal sub well ordering. Sierpi\'nski [1918], p 117. |
25: | \(\aleph _{\beta +1}\) is regular for all ordinals \(\beta\). |
315: |
\(\Omega = \omega_1\), where |
Comment: