We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 133 \(\Rightarrow\) 90 |
Dedekind-Endlichkeit und Wohlordenbarkeit, Brunner, N. 1982a, Monatsh. Math. |
| 90 \(\Rightarrow\) 51 |
Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
| 51 \(\Rightarrow\) 337 |
Non-constructive properties of the real numbers, Howard, P. 2001, Math. Logic Quart. |
| 337 \(\Rightarrow\) 92 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 133: | Every set is either well orderable or has an infinite amorphous subset. |
| 90: | \(LW\): Every linearly ordered set can be well ordered. Jech [1973b], p 133. |
| 51: | Cofinality Principle: Every linear ordering has a cofinal sub well ordering. Sierpi\'nski [1918], p 117. |
| 337: | \(C(WO\), uniformly linearly ordered): If \(X\) is a well ordered collection of non-empty sets and there is a function \(f\) defined on \(X\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a linear ordering of \(x\), then there is a choice function for \(X\). |
| 92: | \(C(WO,{\Bbb R})\): Every well ordered family of non-empty subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) has a choice function. |
Comment: