Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

90 \(\Rightarrow\) 194 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
90 \(\Rightarrow\) 91	The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 133
91 \(\Rightarrow\) 79	clear
79 \(\Rightarrow\) 94	clear
94 \(\Rightarrow\) 194	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
90:	\(LW\): Every linearly ordered set can be well ordered. Jech [1973b], p 133.
91:	\(PW\): The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered.
79:	\({\Bbb R}\) can be well ordered. Hilbert [1900], p 263.
94:	\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty,{\Bbb R})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty sets of reals has a choice function. Jech [1973b], p 148 prob 10.1.
194:	\(C(\varPi^1_2)\) or \(AC(\varPi^1_2)\): If \(P\in \omega\times{}^{\omega}\omega\), \(P\) has domain \(\omega\), and \(P\) is in \(\varPi^1_2\), then there is a sequence of elements \(\langle x_{k}: k\in\omega\rangle\) of \({}^{\omega}\omega\) with \(\langle k,x_{k}\rangle \in P\) for all \(k\in\omega\). Kanovei [1979].

Comment:

Back