We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
181 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 | clear |
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 24 | clear |
24 \(\Rightarrow\) 26 | Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, 66 Le¸cons sur la th´eorie des fonctions, Borel, [1898] |
26 \(\Rightarrow\) 209 | note-72 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
181: | \(C(2^{\aleph_0},\infty)\): Every set \(X\) of non-empty sets such that \(|X|=2^{\aleph_0}\) has a choice function. |
8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\): |
24: | \(C(\aleph_0,2^{(2^{\aleph_0})})\): Every denumerable collection of non-empty sets each with power \(2^{(2^{\aleph_{0}})}\) has a choice function. |
26: | \(UT(\aleph_{0},2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}})\): The union of denumerably many sets each of power \(2^{\aleph _{0}}\) has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\). |
209: | There is an ordinal \(\alpha\) such that for all \(X\), if \(X\) is a denumerable union of denumerable sets then \({\cal P}(X)\) cannot be partitioned into \(\aleph_{\alpha}\) non-empty sets. |
Comment: