We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

112 \(\Rightarrow\) 223
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
112 \(\Rightarrow\) 90 Equivalents of the Axiom of Choice II, Rubin/Rubin, 1985, page 79
90 \(\Rightarrow\) 91 The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 133
91 \(\Rightarrow\) 79 clear
79 \(\Rightarrow\) 70 clear
70 \(\Rightarrow\) 206 clear
206 \(\Rightarrow\) 223 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
112:

\(MC(\infty,LO)\): For every family \(X\) of non-empty sets each of which can be linearly ordered there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in X\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty finite subset of \(y\).

90:

\(LW\):  Every linearly ordered set can be well ordered. Jech [1973b], p 133.

91:

\(PW\):  The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered.

79:

\({\Bbb R}\) can be well ordered.  Hilbert [1900], p 263.

70:

There is a non-trivial ultrafilter on \(\omega\). Jech [1973b], prob 5.24.

206:

The existence of a non-principal ultrafilter: There exists an infinite set \(X\) and a non-principal ultrafilter on \(X\).

223:

There is an infinite set \(X\) and a non-principal measure on \(\cal P(X)\).

Comment:

Back