Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

292 \(\Rightarrow\) 309 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
292 \(\Rightarrow\) 90	The axiom of choice and linearly ordered sets, Howard, P. 1977, Fund. Math.
90 \(\Rightarrow\) 91	The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 133
91 \(\Rightarrow\) 309	Equivalents of the Axiom of Choice II, Rubin, 1985, theorem 5.7

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
292:	\(MC(LO,\infty)\): For each linearly ordered family of non-empty sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is non-empty, finite subset of \(x\).
90:	\(LW\): Every linearly ordered set can be well ordered. Jech [1973b], p 133.
91:	\(PW\): The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered.
309:	The Banach-Tarski Paradox: There are three finite partitions \(\{P_1,\ldots\), \(P_n\}\), \(\{Q_1,\ldots,Q_r\}\) and \(\{S_1,\ldots,S_n, T_1,\ldots,T_r\}\) of \(B^3 = \{x\in {\Bbb R}^3 : \|x\| \le 1\}\) such that \(P_i\) is congruent to \(S_i\) for \(1\le i\le n\) and \(Q_i\) is congruent to \(T_i\) for \(1\le i\le r\).

Comment:

Back