Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

292 \(\Rightarrow\) 307
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
292 \(\Rightarrow\) 90 The axiom of choice and linearly ordered sets, Howard, P. 1977, Fund. Math.
90 \(\Rightarrow\) 91 The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 133
91 \(\Rightarrow\) 305 Equivalents of the Axiom of Choice II, Rubin, 1985, theorem 5.7
305 \(\Rightarrow\) 307 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
292:

\(MC(LO,\infty)\): For each linearly ordered family of non-empty sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is non-empty, finite subset of \(x\).

90:

\(LW\):  Every linearly ordered set can be well ordered. Jech [1973b], p 133.

91:

\(PW\):  The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered.

305:

There are \(2^{\aleph_0}\) Vitali equivalence classes. (Vitali equivalence classes are equivalence classes of the real numbers under the relation \(x\equiv y\leftrightarrow(\exists q\in{\Bbb Q})(x-y=q)\).). \ac{Kanovei} \cite{1991}.

307:

If \(m\) is the cardinality of the set of Vitali equivalence classes, then \(H(m) = H(2^{\aleph_0})\), where \(H\) is Hartogs aleph function and the {\it Vitali equivalence classes} are equivalence classes of the real numbers under the relation \(x\equiv y\leftrightarrow(\exists q\in {\Bbb Q})(x-y=q)\).

Comment:

Back