We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
164 \(\Rightarrow\) 91 |
Dedekind-Endlichkeit und Wohlordenbarkeit, Brunner, N. 1982a, Monatsh. Math. |
91 \(\Rightarrow\) 79 | clear |
79 \(\Rightarrow\) 139 | |
139 \(\Rightarrow\) 137-k |
Cancellation laws for surjective cardinals, Truss, J. K. 1984, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
164: | Every non-well-orderable set has an infinite subset with a Dedekind finite power set. |
91: | \(PW\): The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered. |
79: | \({\Bbb R}\) can be well ordered. Hilbert [1900], p 263. |
139: | Using the discrete topology on 2, \(2^{\cal P(\omega)}\) is compact. |
137-k: | Suppose \(k\in\omega-\{0\}\). If \(f\) is a 1-1 map from \(k\times X\) into \(k\times Y\) then there are partitions \(X = \bigcup_{i \le k} X_{i} \) and \(Y = \bigcup_{i \le k} Y_{i} \) of \(X\) and \(Y\) such that \(f\) maps \(\bigcup_{i \le k} (\{i\} \times X_{i})\) onto \(\bigcup_{i \le k} (\{i\} \times Y_{i})\). |
Comment: