We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
			
| Implication | Reference | 
|---|---|
| 92 \(\Rightarrow\) 94 | clear | 
| 94 \(\Rightarrow\) 13 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 148 problem 10.1 | 
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement | 
|---|---|
| 92: | \(C(WO,{\Bbb R})\): Every well ordered family of non-empty subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) has a choice function. | 
| 94: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty,{\Bbb R})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty sets of reals has a choice function. Jech [1973b], p 148 prob 10.1. | 
| 13: | Every Dedekind finite subset of \({\Bbb R}\) is finite. | 
Comment: