Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

126 \(\Rightarrow\) 38 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
126 \(\Rightarrow\) 94	Non-constructive properties of the real numbers, Howard, P. 2001, Math. Logic Quart.
94 \(\Rightarrow\) 5	clear
5 \(\Rightarrow\) 38	Non-constructive properties of the real numbers, Howard, P. 2001, Math. Logic Quart.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
126:	\(MC(\aleph_0,\infty)\), Countable axiom of multiple choice: For every denumerable set \(X\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in X\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty finite subset of \(y\).
94:	\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty,{\Bbb R})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty sets of reals has a choice function. Jech [1973b], p 148 prob 10.1.
5:	\(C(\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\Bbb R)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty denumerable subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) has a choice function.
38:	\({\Bbb R}\) is not the union of a countable family of countable sets.

Comment:

Back