We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 211 \(\Rightarrow\) 94 |
Non-constructive properties of the real numbers, Howard, P. 2001, Math. Logic Quart. |
| 94 \(\Rightarrow\) 5 | clear |
| 5 \(\Rightarrow\) 38 |
Non-constructive properties of the real numbers, Howard, P. 2001, Math. Logic Quart. |
| 38 \(\Rightarrow\) 108 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 211: | \(DCR\): Dependent choice for relations on \(\Bbb R\): If \(R\subseteq\Bbb R\times\Bbb R\) satisfies \((\forall x\in \Bbb R)(\exists y\in\Bbb R)(x\mathrel R y)\) then there is a sequence \(\langle x(n): n\in\omega\rangle\) of real numbers such that \((\forall n\in\omega)(x(n)\mathrel R x(n+1))\). |
| 94: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty,{\Bbb R})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty sets of reals has a choice function. Jech [1973b], p 148 prob 10.1. |
| 5: | \(C(\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\Bbb R)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty denumerable subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) has a choice function. |
| 38: | \({\Bbb R}\) is not the union of a countable family of countable sets. |
| 108: | There is an ordinal \(\alpha\) such that \(2^{\aleph _{\alpha}}\) is not the union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets. |
Comment: