We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
212 \(\Rightarrow\) 94 | clear |
94 \(\Rightarrow\) 13 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 148 problem 10.1 |
13 \(\Rightarrow\) 199(\(n\)) | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
212: | \(C(2^{\aleph_{0}},\subseteq{\Bbb R})\): If \(R\) is a relation on \({\Bbb R}\) such that for all \(x\in{\Bbb R}\), there is a \(y\in{\Bbb R}\) such that \(x\mathrel R y\), then there is a function \(f: {\Bbb R} \rightarrow{\Bbb R}\) such that for all \(x\in{\Bbb R}\), \(x\mathrel R f(x)\). |
94: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty,{\Bbb R})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty sets of reals has a choice function. Jech [1973b], p 148 prob 10.1. |
13: | Every Dedekind finite subset of \({\Bbb R}\) is finite. |
199(\(n\)): | (For \(n\in\omega-\{0,1\}\)) If all \(\varSigma^{1}_{n}\), Dedekind finite subsets of \({}^{\omega }\omega\) are finite, then all \(\varPi^1_n\) Dedekind finite subsets of \({}^{\omega} \omega\) are finite. |
Comment: