We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
181 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 | clear |
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 27 | clear |
27 \(\Rightarrow\) 31 | clear |
31 \(\Rightarrow\) 35 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
181: | \(C(2^{\aleph_0},\infty)\): Every set \(X\) of non-empty sets such that \(|X|=2^{\aleph_0}\) has a choice function. |
8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\): |
27: | \((\forall \alpha)( UT(\aleph_{0},\aleph_{\alpha}, \aleph_{\alpha}))\): The union of denumerably many sets each of power \(\aleph_{\alpha }\) has power \(\aleph_{\alpha}\). Moore, G. [1982], p 36. |
31: | \(UT(\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0})\): The countable union theorem: The union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets is denumerable. |
35: | The union of countably many meager subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) is meager. (Meager sets are the same as sets of the first category.) Jech [1973b] p 7 prob 1.7. |
Comment: