We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
203 \(\Rightarrow\) 94 | note-67 |
94 \(\Rightarrow\) 35 |
Non-constructive properties of the real numbers, Howard, P. 2001, Math. Logic Quart. |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
203: | \(C\)(disjoint,\(\subseteq\Bbb R)\): Every partition of \({\cal P}(\omega)\) into non-empty subsets has a choice function. |
94: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty,{\Bbb R})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty sets of reals has a choice function. Jech [1973b], p 148 prob 10.1. |
35: | The union of countably many meager subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) is meager. (Meager sets are the same as sets of the first category.) Jech [1973b] p 7 prob 1.7. |
Comment: