Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

168 \(\Rightarrow\) 84 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
168 \(\Rightarrow\) 100	clear
100 \(\Rightarrow\) 9	On the existence of large sets of Dedekind cardinals, Tarski, A. 1965, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 162 problem 11.8
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 84	Definitions of finite, Howard, P. 1989, Fund. Math.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
168:	Dual Cantor-Bernstein Theorem:\((\forall x) (\forall y)(\|x\| \le^\|y\|\) and \(\|y\|\le^ \|x\|\) implies \(\|x\| = \|y\|)\) .
100:	Weak Partition Principle: For all sets \(x\) and \(y\), if \(x\precsim^* y\), then it is not the case that \(y\prec x\).
9:	Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.
84:	\(E(II,III)\) (Howard/Yorke [1989]): \((\forall x)(x\) is \(T\)-finite if and only if \(\cal P(x)\) is Dedekind finite).

Comment:

Back