Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

100 \(\Rightarrow\) 48-K
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
100 \(\Rightarrow\) 347 Partition principles and infinite sums of cardinal numbers, Higasikawa, M. 1995, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
347 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 Partition principles and infinite sums of cardinal numbers, Higasikawa, M. 1995, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 clear
122 \(\Rightarrow\) 48-K clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
100:

Weak Partition Principle:  For all sets \(x\) and \(y\), if \(x\precsim^* y\), then it is not the case that \(y\prec x\).

347:

Idemmultiple Partition Principle: If \(y\) is idemmultiple (\(2\times y\approx y\)) and \(x\precsim ^* y\), then \(x\precsim y\).

40:

\(C(WO,\infty)\):  Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.

122:

\(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

48-K:

If \(K\) is a finite subset of \(\omega-\{0,1\}\), \(C(WO,K)\): For every \(n\in K,\) \(C(WO,n)\).

Comment:

Back