Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

100 \(\Rightarrow\) 151
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
100 \(\Rightarrow\) 347 Partition principles and infinite sums of cardinal numbers, Higasikawa, M. 1995, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
347 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 Partition principles and infinite sums of cardinal numbers, Higasikawa, M. 1995, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 231 Abzählbarkeit und Wohlordenbarkeit, Felgner, U. 1974, Comment. Math. Helv.
231 \(\Rightarrow\) 151 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
100:

Weak Partition Principle:  For all sets \(x\) and \(y\), if \(x\precsim^* y\), then it is not the case that \(y\prec x\).

347:

Idemmultiple Partition Principle: If \(y\) is idemmultiple (\(2\times y\approx y\)) and \(x\precsim ^* y\), then \(x\precsim y\).

40:

\(C(WO,\infty)\):  Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.

231:

\(UT(WO,WO,WO)\): The union of a well ordered collection of well orderable sets is well orderable.

151:

\(UT(WO,\aleph_{0},WO)\) (\(U_{\aleph_{1}}\)): The union of a well ordered set of denumerable sets is well  orderable. (If \(\kappa\) is a well ordered cardinal, see note 27 for \(UT(WO,\kappa,WO)\).)

Comment:

Back