Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

106 \(\Rightarrow\) 35 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
106 \(\Rightarrow\) 126	Injectivity, projectivity and the axiom of choice, Blass, A. 1979, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
126 \(\Rightarrow\) 94	Non-constructive properties of the real numbers, Howard, P. 2001, Math. Logic Quart.
94 \(\Rightarrow\) 35	Non-constructive properties of the real numbers, Howard, P. 2001, Math. Logic Quart.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
106:	Baire Category Theorem for Compact Hausdorff Spaces: Every compact Hausdorff space is Baire.
126:	\(MC(\aleph_0,\infty)\), Countable axiom of multiple choice: For every denumerable set \(X\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in X\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty finite subset of \(y\).
94:	\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty,{\Bbb R})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty sets of reals has a choice function. Jech [1973b], p 148 prob 10.1.
35:	The union of countably many meager subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) is meager. (Meager sets are the same as sets of the first category.) Jech [1973b] p 7 prob 1.7.

Comment:

Back