Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

426 \(\Rightarrow\) 127 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
426 \(\Rightarrow\) 8	On first and second countable spaces and the axiom of choice, Gutierres, G 2004, Topology and its Applications.
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 9	Was sind und was sollen die Zollen?, Dedekind, [1888]
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 64	The independence of various definitions of finiteness, Levy, A. 1958, Fund. Math. clear
64 \(\Rightarrow\) 127	Amorphe Potenzen kompakter Raume, Brunner, N. 1984b, Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforschung

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
426:	If \((X,\cal T) \) is a first countable topological space and \((\cal B(x))_{x\in X}\) is a family such that for all \(x \in X\), \(\cal B(x)\) is a local base at \(x\), then there is a family \(( \cal V(x))_{x\in X}\) such that for every \(x \in X\), \(\cal V(x)\) is a countable local base at \(x\) and \(\cal V(x) \subseteq \cal B(x)\).
8:	\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):
9:	Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.
64:	\(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.)
127:	An amorphous power of a compact \(T_2\) space, which as a set is well orderable, is well orderable.

Comment:

Back