Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

391 \(\Rightarrow\) 397
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
391 \(\Rightarrow\) 112 clear
112 \(\Rightarrow\) 395 clear
395 \(\Rightarrow\) 397 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
391:

\(C(\infty,LO)\): Every set of non-empty linearly orderable sets has a choice function.

112:

\(MC(\infty,LO)\): For every family \(X\) of non-empty sets each of which can be linearly ordered there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in X\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty finite subset of \(y\).

395:

\(MC(LO,LO)\): For each linearly ordered family of non-empty linearly orderable sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is a non-empty, finite subset of \(x\).

397:

\(MC(WO,LO)\): For each well ordered family of non-empty linearly orderable sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is a non-empty, finite subset of \(x\).

Comment:

Back