We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
151 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 |
Russell's alternative to the axiom of choice, Howard, P. 1992, Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. note-27 |
122 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 | clear |
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 288-n | clear |
288-n \(\Rightarrow\) 373-n | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
151: | \(UT(WO,\aleph_{0},WO)\) (\(U_{\aleph_{1}}\)): The union of a well ordered set of denumerable sets is well orderable. (If \(\kappa\) is a well ordered cardinal, see note 27 for \(UT(WO,\kappa,WO)\).) |
122: | \(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
10: | \(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
288-n: | If \(n\in\omega-\{0,1\}\), \(C(\aleph_0,n)\): Every denumerable set of \(n\)-element sets has a choice function. |
373-n: | (For \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\).) \(PC(\aleph_0,n,\infty)\): Every denumerable set of \(n\)-element sets has an infinite subset with a choice function. |
Comment: