Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

39 \(\Rightarrow\) 389 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8	clear
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 9	Was sind und was sollen die Zollen?, Dedekind, [1888]
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 10	Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, 322
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 80	clear
80 \(\Rightarrow\) 389	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
39:	\(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202.
8:	\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):
9:	Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.
10:	\(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.
80:	\(C(\aleph_{0},2)\): Every denumerable set of pairs has a choice function.
389:	\(C(\aleph_0,2,\cal P({\Bbb R}))\): Every denumerable family of two element subsets of \(\cal P({\Bbb R})\) has a choice function. \ac{Keremedis} \cite{1999b}.

Comment:

Back