We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
380 \(\Rightarrow\) 132 | clear |
132 \(\Rightarrow\) 73 | clear |
73 \(\Rightarrow\) 342-n | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
380: | \(PC(\infty,WO,\infty)\): For every infinite family of non-empty well orderable sets, there is an infinite subfamily \(Y\) of \(X\) which has a choice function. |
132: | \(PC(\infty, <\aleph_0,\infty)\): Every infinite family of finite sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. |
73: | \(\forall n\in\omega\), \(PC(\infty,n,\infty)\): For every \(n\in\omega\), if \(C\) is an infinite family of \(n\) element sets, then \(C\) has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco [1998b] |
342-n: | (For \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\).) \(PC(\infty,n,\infty)\): Every infinite family of \(n\)-element sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. (See Form 166.) |
Comment: