Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

133 \(\Rightarrow\) 32
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
133 \(\Rightarrow\) 231 note-123
231 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
133:  

Every set is either well orderable or has an infinite amorphous subset.

231:

\(UT(WO,WO,WO)\): The union of a well ordered collection of well orderable sets is well orderable.

32:

\(C(\aleph_0,\le\aleph_0)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty countable sets  has a choice function.

Comment:

Back