We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
394 \(\Rightarrow\) 165 | clear |
165 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 | clear |
32 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 | clear |
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 423 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
394: | \(C(WO,LO)\): Every well ordered set of non-empty linearly orderable sets has a choice function. |
165: | \(C(WO,WO)\): Every well ordered family of non-empty, well orderable sets has a choice function. |
32: | \(C(\aleph_0,\le\aleph_0)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty countable sets has a choice function. |
10: | \(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
423: | \(\forall n\in \omega-\{o,1\}\), \(C(\aleph_0, n)\) : For every \(n\in \omega - \{0,1\}\), every denumerable set of \(n\) element sets has a choice function. |
Comment: