Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

394 \(\Rightarrow\) 216
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
394 \(\Rightarrow\) 165 clear
165 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 clear
32 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 clear
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 216

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
394:

\(C(WO,LO)\): Every well ordered set of non-empty linearly orderable sets has a choice function.

165:

\(C(WO,WO)\):  Every well ordered family of non-empty, well orderable sets has a choice function.

32:

\(C(\aleph_0,\le\aleph_0)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty countable sets  has a choice function.

10:

\(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\):  Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

216:

Every infinite tree has either an infinite chain or an infinite antichain.

Comment:

Back