Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

264 \(\Rightarrow\) 421 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
264 \(\Rightarrow\) 202	Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
202 \(\Rightarrow\) 40	clear
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39	clear
39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8	clear
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 421	Unions and the axiom of choice, De-la-Cruz-Hall-Howard-Keremedis-Rubin-2002B[2002B], Math. Logic Quart.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
264:	\(H(C,P)\): Every connected relation \((X,R)\) contains a \(\subseteq\)-maximal partially ordered set.
202:	\(C(LO,\infty)\): Every linearly ordered family of non-empty sets has a choice function.
40:	\(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.
39:	\(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202.
8:	\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):
421:	\(UT(\aleph_0,WO,WO)\): The union of a denumerable set of well orderable sets can be well ordered.

Comment:

Back