We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 264 \(\Rightarrow\) 202 |
Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
| 202 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 | clear |
| 40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 | clear |
| 39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 | clear |
| 8 \(\Rightarrow\) 352 |
Disasters in metric topology without choice, Keremedis, K. 2002, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 264: | \(H(C,P)\): Every connected relation \((X,R)\) contains a \(\subseteq\)-maximal partially ordered set. |
| 202: | \(C(LO,\infty)\): Every linearly ordered family of non-empty sets has a choice function. |
| 40: | \(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325. |
| 39: | \(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202. |
| 8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\): |
| 352: | A countable product of second countable spaces is second countable. |
Comment: