Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

8 \(\Rightarrow\) 131
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 126 clear
126 \(\Rightarrow\) 131 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
8:

\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):

126:

\(MC(\aleph_0,\infty)\), Countable axiom of multiple choice: For every denumerable set \(X\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in X\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty finite subset of \(y\).

131:

\(MC_\omega(\aleph_0,\infty)\): For every denumerable family \(X\) of pairwise disjoint non-empty sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for each \(x\in X\), f(x) is a non-empty countable subset of \(x\).

Comment:

Back