Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

264 \(\Rightarrow\) 196-alpha
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
264 \(\Rightarrow\) 202 Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
202 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 clear
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 86-alpha clear
86-alpha \(\Rightarrow\) 196-alpha Successive large cardinals, Bull Jr., E. L. 1978, Ann. Math. Logic

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
264:

\(H(C,P)\): Every connected relation \((X,R)\) contains a \(\subseteq\)-maximal partially ordered set.

202:

\(C(LO,\infty)\): Every linearly ordered family of non-empty sets has  a choice function.

40:

\(C(WO,\infty)\):  Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.

86-alpha:

\(C(\aleph_{\alpha},\infty)\): If \(X\) is a set of non-empty sets such that \(|X| = \aleph_{\alpha }\), then \(X\) has a choice function.

196-alpha:

\(\aleph_{\alpha}\) and \(\aleph_{\alpha+1}\) are not both measurable.

Comment:

Back