We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
426 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 |
On first and second countable spaces and the axiom of choice, Gutierres, G 2004, Topology and its Applications. |
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 126 | clear |
126 \(\Rightarrow\) 131 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
426: | If \((X,\cal T) \) is a first countable topological space and \((\cal B(x))_{x\in X}\) is a family such that for all \(x \in X\), \(\cal B(x)\) is a local base at \(x\), then there is a family \(( \cal V(x))_{x\in X}\) such that for every \(x \in X\), \(\cal V(x)\) is a countable local base at \(x\) and \(\cal V(x) \subseteq \cal B(x)\). |
8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\): |
126: | \(MC(\aleph_0,\infty)\), Countable axiom of multiple choice: For every denumerable set \(X\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in X\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty finite subset of \(y\). |
131: | \(MC_\omega(\aleph_0,\infty)\): For every denumerable family \(X\) of pairwise disjoint non-empty sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for each \(x\in X\), f(x) is a non-empty countable subset of \(x\). |
Comment: