We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
264 \(\Rightarrow\) 202 |
Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
202 \(\Rightarrow\) 91 | note-75 |
91 \(\Rightarrow\) 79 | clear |
79 \(\Rightarrow\) 203 | clear |
203 \(\Rightarrow\) 306 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
264: | \(H(C,P)\): Every connected relation \((X,R)\) contains a \(\subseteq\)-maximal partially ordered set. |
202: | \(C(LO,\infty)\): Every linearly ordered family of non-empty sets has a choice function. |
91: | \(PW\): The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered. |
79: | \({\Bbb R}\) can be well ordered. Hilbert [1900], p 263. |
203: | \(C\)(disjoint,\(\subseteq\Bbb R)\): Every partition of \({\cal P}(\omega)\) into non-empty subsets has a choice function. |
306: | The set of Vitali equivalence classes is linearly orderable. (Vitali equivalence classes are equivalence classes of the real numbers under the relation \(x\equiv y\leftrightarrow (\exists q\in{\Bbb Q})(x-y = q)\).). |
Comment: