We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
313 \(\Rightarrow\) 222 | The Banach-Tarski Paradox, Wagon, [1985] |
222 \(\Rightarrow\) 142 |
The strength of the Hahn-Banach theorem, Pincus, D. 1972c, Lecture Notes in Mathematics |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
313: | \(\Bbb Z\) (the set of integers under addition) is amenable. (\(G\) is {\it amenable} if there is a finitely additive measure \(\mu\) on \(\cal P(G)\) such that \(\mu(G) = 1\) and \(\forall A\subseteq G, \forall g\in G\), \(\mu(gA)=\mu(A)\).) |
222: | There is a non-principal measure on \(\cal P(\omega)\). |
142: | \(\neg PB\): There is a set of reals without the property of Baire. Jech [1973b], p. 7. |
Comment: