We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
313 \(\Rightarrow\) 222 | The Banach-Tarski Paradox, Wagon, [1985] |
222 \(\Rightarrow\) 223 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
313: | \(\Bbb Z\) (the set of integers under addition) is amenable. (\(G\) is {\it amenable} if there is a finitely additive measure \(\mu\) on \(\cal P(G)\) such that \(\mu(G) = 1\) and \(\forall A\subseteq G, \forall g\in G\), \(\mu(gA)=\mu(A)\).) |
222: | There is a non-principal measure on \(\cal P(\omega)\). |
223: | There is an infinite set \(X\) and a non-principal measure on \(\cal P(X)\). |
Comment: