We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
239 \(\Rightarrow\) 427 | clear |
427 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 | clear |
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 89 |
On cardinals and their successors, Jech, T. 1966a, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. |
89 \(\Rightarrow\) 90 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 133 |
90 \(\Rightarrow\) 51 |
Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
51 \(\Rightarrow\) 25 |
Choice and cofinal well-ordered subsets, Morris, D.B. 1969, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. |
25 \(\Rightarrow\) 34 | clear |
34 \(\Rightarrow\) 19 |
Sur les fonctions representables analytiquement, Lebesgue, H. 1905, J. Math. Pures Appl. |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
239: | AL20(\(\mathbb Q\)): Every vector \(V\) space over \(\mathbb Q\) has the property that every linearly independent subset of \(V\) can be extended to a basis. Rubin, H./Rubin, J. [1985], p.119, AL20. |
427: | \(\exists F\) AL20(\(F\)): There is a field \(F\) such that every vector space \(V\) over \(F\) has the property that every independent subset of \(V\) can be extended to a basis. \ac{Bleicher} \cite{1964}, \ac{Rubin, H.\/Rubin, J \cite{1985, p.119, AL20}. |
67: | \(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite). |
89: | Antichain Principle: Every partially ordered set has a maximal antichain. Jech [1973b], p 133. |
90: | \(LW\): Every linearly ordered set can be well ordered. Jech [1973b], p 133. |
51: | Cofinality Principle: Every linear ordering has a cofinal sub well ordering. Sierpi\'nski [1918], p 117. |
25: | \(\aleph _{\beta +1}\) is regular for all ordinals \(\beta\). |
34: | \(\aleph_{1}\) is regular. |
19: | A real function is analytically representable if and only if it is in Baire's classification. G.Moore [1982], equation (2.3.1). |
Comment: