Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

258 \(\Rightarrow\) 362 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
258 \(\Rightarrow\) 255	Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
255 \(\Rightarrow\) 260	Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
260 \(\Rightarrow\) 40	Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39	clear
39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8	clear
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 361	Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, page 325
361 \(\Rightarrow\) 362	Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, page 325

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
258:	\(Z(D,L)\): Every directed relation \((X,R)\) in which linearly ordered subsets have upper bounds, has a maximal element.
255:	\(Z(D,R)\): Every directed relation \((P,R)\) in which every ramified subset \(A\) has an upper bound, has a maximal element.
260:	\(Z(TR\&C,P)\): If \((X,R)\) is a transitive and connected relation in which every partially ordered subset has an upper bound, then \((X,R)\) has a maximal element.
40:	\(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.
39:	\(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202.
8:	\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):
361:	In \(\Bbb R\), the union of a denumerable number of analytic sets is analytic. G. Moore [1982], pp 181 and 325.
362:	In \(\Bbb R\), every Borel set is analytic. G. Moore [1982], pp 181 and 325.

Comment:

Back