Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

100 \(\Rightarrow\) 82
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
100 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 On the existence of large sets of Dedekind cardinals, Tarski, A. 1965, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.
The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 162 problem 11.8
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 82 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
100:

Weak Partition Principle:  For all sets \(x\) and \(y\), if \(x\precsim^* y\), then it is not the case that \(y\prec x\).

9:

Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.

82:

\(E(I,III)\) (Howard/Yorke [1989]): If \(X\) is infinite then \(\cal P(X)\) is Dedekind infinite. (\(X\) is finite \(\Leftrightarrow {\cal P}(X)\) is Dedekind finite.)

Comment:

Back